Lucie Havlickova vs Mia Pohankova Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Mia Pohankova has a slightly lower second serve point win percentage at 33.66% in recent form, compared to Lucie Havlickova's 38.88%. Could this offer Havlickova an edge?
• Return Game Stats: Pohankova is more successful with both first and second serve returns, winning 51.61% and 30.00% respectively, over Havlickova's 48.93% and 25.95%. Does this indicate Pohankova's superior return capability?
• Under Pressure Performance: Mia excels under pressure, saving 58.14% of break points, outperforming Lucie who saves 46.82%.
• Overall Performance: Havlickova holds a marginal edge with an 86.36% win rate over the past year, compared to Pohankova's 80.00%.
• Best Surface: Both players excel on indoor hard courts with identical win rates of 81%, suggesting similar competitiveness on this surface.
• Player Level: Havlickova has faced slightly tougher competition, reflected in her higher win percentage of 93.33% in Futures/ITF $10K events compared to Pohankova's 84.21% in Challengers/ITF > $10K events. Does this indicate greater match experience for Havlickova?
• Opponent Quality: Lucie has competed against higher ranked opponents, opposed to Mia's lower-ranked adversaries.
• Deciding Set Performance: Pohankova is flawless in deciding sets over the past year, suggesting she has the psychological advantage if the match goes the distance, as Havlickova has struggled in this scenario.

Editorial Prediction (October 4, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing second serve performance, Lucie Havlickova may hold a slight advantage, potentially increasing her chances to dominate in this area. However, Mia Pohankova's return statistics, especially her ability to win on her opponent’s second serve, indicate her capability to counteract Havlickova's second serve advantage.

Under pressure, Pohankova demonstrates an impressive ability to save break points, a key factor that could play a decisive role in crucial match moments. Although their win rates over the past year are closely comparable, Havlickova has faced tougher opponents, suggesting better preparation for high-pressure matches.

Both competitors are performing their best on indoor hard courts, leveling the playing field. But the telling factor might be in the deciding set performance, where Pohankova is unbeaten, potentially indicating a mental edge in the final stages of the match.

Given these insights, while Lucie Havlickova presents a strong case with her overall match performance and opponent quality, Mia Pohankova's return abilities, breakpoint resilience, and superior performance in deciding sets suggest she holds the upper hand to win the upcoming match.